Tuesday, October 20, 2020

Following up on Democracy with my MP



Three weeks ago, I wrote to my MP to ask for his commitment to democracy.

As yet, he has not replied. There could be no end of reasons for this in these unusual, Covid times. I need to stay calm and remember that stuff happens. That when things go wrong, it is far more likely to be a cockup rather than a conspiracy.

So, rather than go off down some rabbit hole of conspiracy invention, I will simply take a deep breath, a swig of strong coffee and try again.

Now, it would not be appropriate to simply re-send the last letter. Although it is only 3 weeks since it was sent, events have moved on.

Robert Jenrick, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, has been in the headlines again after his illegal intervention support of a Tory donor, he now has conspired with his junior minister to do a spot of gerrymandering to ensure that funds are routed to his and the junior minister’s constituencies.

Oliver Dowden, Culture Secretary, has floated an idea that would further undermine public services broadcasting in this country by privatising Channel 4.

The UK has had its credit rating downgraded by Moody’s. Not a totally unexpected event given the Covid situation & Brexit. However, one factor in the downgrade was the erosion of democratic institutions.

There may be other events I should have noticed and worthy of inclusion. Sadly, the general standard of this government has highlighted so many examples of incompetence, corruption and general disregard for the health and wellbeing of this nation and its democracy it is like trying to follow an individual starling in a murmuration.



Therefore, I took my original letter and revamped it before sharing it with my MP. As always, I will keep you updated with any progress.

The letter is below for your delectation and delight.

Dear Mr Pursglove,

I wrote to you on the 28th September to highlight my concerns over the direction of travel of this government with regard to maintaining the safety of the British Democracy and its institutions. Having not yet had any response, I am writing again as I fear that the original may have been misplaced.

Since that original letter, other events have occurred that serve to increase my disquiet over just how safe democracy in this country in the hands of the current government. The questions have therefore been updated to take these events into account.

Do you as an MP commit to the continuing democracy of the United Kingdom? By this, I mean more than ensuring that the people are able to vote. This includes ensuring the supporting institutions and democratic principles are robust; adequately funded and ensuring adequate scrutiny is applied to Government actions?

Do you also commit to ensuring the government is subject to full scrutiny to ensure that it follows the rule of law?

As you hold a Politics degree, I am sure you will be disturbed that one of your constituents would ever feel the need to ask their MP to commit to British democracy. As you are a passionate campaigner to regain sovereignty from the EU, I am sure that you would be aghast if having regained our sovereignty, it became tainted by corruption, unelected advisors, contempt for the rule of law and an erosion of our British freedoms.

To assist, below is a summary of why I feel current government actions threaten the future of our precious and fragile democracy and some supplemental questions.

1.            The Civil Service is supposed to be provide independent & impartial advice and support in the implementation of government policy. Since this government has come to power, they have systematically replaced senior Civil Servants with their own, seemingly political appointments. Do you believe this supports good governance and ensures adequate scrutiny is applied to the details of government actions?

2.            The government has signalled it is intent to limit access to Judicial Review of government. Do you believe this supports good governance and ensures adequate scrutiny is applied to the details of government actions?

3.            The judicial system has been subject to a series of cuts and budget constraints over the last decade that has resulted in ever growing backlog of cases. This backlog has only been made worse by the current Covid crisis. Do you commit to ensuring that the funding of our legal system to address the backlog and ensure that our justice system is functioning effectively?

4.            The Russian Report was published by the ISC on 21/07/2020. This showed some unsettling interventions in the UK political system. Subsequent revelations in the US has shown that these interventions have been widespread and deliberately designed to subvert the democratic process. Do you commit to pushing the government to holding an independent enquiry into the impacts of the foreign interventions into the UK democratic process and putting forward recommendations to prevent this in future?

5.            Government ministers appear to be avoiding scrutiny and taking actions that appear to be corrupting the democratic process. An example being the allocation of the Town Fund which appears to have been done in a way that ignores the advice of officials and benefits Conservative targeted marginal seats. It also appears that Robert Jenrick has manipulated process to ensure funding for his and a junior minister’s constituency in what some may describe as gerrymandering. Do you commit to ensuring that the decision is reviewed and that funds are allocated according to need rather than political gain?

6.            The government appears to be denuding the Public Service Broadcasting, BBC and the free press in the country of funding while placing political friends in positions of authority that can influence the impartiality and freedom of the press. Do you commit to ensuring that the BBC is adequately funded and maintains full editorial independence? Do you also commit to ensuring that adequate scrutiny is put upon the plan to privatise Channel 4 so that the public service aspect of its output & editorial independence is maintained?

7.            Michael Gove has signalled a willingness to amend the UK Human Rights Act ‘to make it easier’ for the government to enact ministers’ executive orders. Do you commit to protecting the UK Human Rights Act, that you will ensure that no changes will be made to the act without full and proper consultation and that when any actions come to be voted upon, they will be a matter of the MP conscience rather than a three-line whip?

May I also draw your attention to the recent downgrade of the UK Credit rating to AAA3 by Moody’s. In what is a highly unusual step, one factor in the downgrade is the erosion of democratic institutions with the Internal Market Bill cited as an example.

I should remind you of why your government finds itself having to breach international law and are struggling to find convincing arguments to justify this shameful action. You supported the Withdrawal Agreement. You voted to reduce the time to scrutinise the agreement, even though at the time concerns were raised over the impacts on the NI peace accord. You then fought and won an election based on the flawed Withdrawal Agreement. That may not have been an issue, but you then voted on an Agriculture Bill that removed food & animal welfare standard provisions sparking the fear that food produced to the woeful US standards would find its way into the EU via Northern Ireland.

The mess of the Internal Markets Bill is of your own making and by showing such disregard to International Law, has destroyed any moral authority the UK may have had when dealing with China on Hong Kong. It now has an adverse impact on the cost of government borrowing.

 

I look forward to your response on the many questions raised in this letter.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

Simon Holder